Skip to content
TELCHAR
Let's talk

Product portfolio

Software systems

Inspect Frame, Praetor, and Forge through their current product screens, alongside the Quaestor opportunity intelligence prototype.

Frame

Inspect platform state and compare courses of action.

Frame is a command and control (C2) platform for inspecting platform state, planning observation and communications tasks, and reviewing operator decisions.

  • Inspect the shared picture
  • Review platform health
  • Compare courses of action
  • Replay recorded decisions
Command and control
Prototype
View Frame
Frame Operations with real geographic basemap, synthetic platforms, red contacts and the selected asset's health and current tasks.

Praetor

Author scenarios and review simulation evidence.

Praetor is a scenario engineering environment for simulation workflows, telemetry, replay, and reviewable evidence.

  • Author scenarios
  • Run simulation workflows
  • Inspect telemetry and replay
  • Review run evidence
Simulation engineering
Active development
View Praetor
Praetor analyst workspace with Python scenario source, scenario explorer and saved scenario map.

Forge

Review public signals with their sources attached.

Forge turns public signals into normalized events, maps, alerts, and source-grounded analysis.

  • Review public signals
  • Inspect events on the globe
  • Arrange an analysis desk
  • Follow analysis to its evidence
Signal intelligence
Live product
View Forge
Forge Inbox with six developments and a globe in a synthetic coastal scenario.

Quaestor

Find the work worth pursuing.

Collect public opportunities, compare fit, and prepare reviewable pursuit reports with human approval gates.

  • Opportunity collection
  • Deterministic scoring
  • AI-assisted review
  • Approval gates
Opportunity intelligence
Prototype
View Quaestor
Quaestor prototype opportunity board with deterministic and AI review signals

Evidence stays attached to the decision.

  • Observe

    Collect the relevant signal and retain provenance.
  • Model

    Structure the problem and expose assumptions.
  • Evaluate

    Compare outputs against explicit criteria.
  • Review

    Keep consequential choices with an accountable person.

The products are distinct, but the method is consistent: make inputs visible, models inspectable, outcomes reviewable, and consequential actions subject to human authority.